Trust centre

Trust the record by understanding how it was created.

Review public information about data handling, security, AI processing, human verification, retention and providers—without unsupported assurances.

Return to the message and evidence behind a suggested record.

A person checks suggestions before relying on operational work.

Owners, dates, wording and status remain reviewable.

Unverified security and provider claims are not presented as fact.

Trust topics

The questions a project team should ask before enabling AI.

Review the security controls Convoe can currently describe publicly, along with the claims that require direct confirmation.

A plain-language overview of Convoe privacy contacts, analytics consent and the relationship to the full privacy policy.

Understand what must be verified before enabling Convoe AI with project data, including providers, retention, training and human review.

Review the maintainable registry for processors used by the public Convoe website and request the current product schedule.

Review how retention, export and deletion should be confirmed for Convoe project data and the public website.

See the difference between an AI suggestion, human confirmation, source message, edit history and completion evidence.

Convoe responsible-AI principles for human approval, source visibility, correction and clear limits in field workflows.

One site is enough to start

Book a review to discuss where AI assists, where people confirm and what your team needs to verify before project use.